Aspects of The Concept of Incarnational Service: 

A Constructive Critical Analysis of Criticism J. Todd Billings

Authors

  • Marselina Grace Kelly STT Reformed Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61719/Transformatio.A2311.001

Keywords:

Incarnational Ministry, Christo-Praxis, Urban Mission, ministry in union with Christ

Abstract

Based on Christian belief in Incarnation of Christ, many theologians developing the concept and the model of ministry which called incarnational ministry. This concept is relevant for developing cross-cultural ministry, including the urban mission. Yet, this concept has its own problem. Many theologians have critics on incarnational ministry. One of them who has a strong argument toward incarnational ministry is J. Todd Billings. He has solid, clear, and directed critics toward incarnational ministry. He has conveyed his contra arguments including some important aspects on incarnational ministry. Especially on biblical, theological, and practical aspects on incarnational ministry. In practical of incarnational ministry concepts, Billings stated that incarnational ministry can’t be used as a serving “model” because of its abstract pattern. Incarnational ministry become abstract because this model does irrelevant and ineffective terms in created the service model which focused on Christ. Especially, in contextual way, incarnational ministry can’t be used as a “model” for cross-cultural missionary. Billings stated that Union with Christ concept is more appropriated used as a model for serving. Because God reveals Himself in a specific and unique way. Humility of Christ become a concrete way to adopt as a model of service and as a Christian lifestyle. Through fairly research toward Christo-praxis aspects in incarnational ministry and fairly with Billings critics, I found that in either way Billings critics that has not strongly foundation. But, in another way, concept of ministry in union with Christ does not has a opposite ways or change the concept of incarnational ministry. Instead of changing the incarnational concept, ministry in union with Christ concept can be a complete forms and constructive arguments to develop the incarnational ministry concept as a model of service in both cross-cultural ministry and urban ministry.

References

Billings, J. Todd. “Incarnational Ministry and Christology: A Reappropriation of the Way of Lowliness.” Missiology 32, no. 2 (1 April 2004): 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/009182960403200205.

———. Union with Christ: Reframing Theology and Ministry for the Church. Grand Rapids, Mich: Baker Academic, 2011.

DePaul, Darren, Jason Draper, Elizabeth Edrington, Elisabeth Elliott, Drew Haltom, Mark Howard, Michael McGarry, dkk. Gospel-Centered Youth Ministry: A Practical Guide. Disunting oleh Cameron Cole dan Jon Nielson. Wheaton: Crossway, 2016.

Easum, Bill. Put on Your Own Oxygen Mask First: Rediscovering Ministry. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 2004.

Goheen, Michael W. Introducing Christian Mission Today: Scripture, History, and Issues. 1st edition. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2014.

Gorman, Michael J. Becoming the Gospel: Paul, Participation, and Mission. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 2015.

Greenway, Roger S., ed. Discipling the City: A Comprehensive Approach to Urban Mission. Eugene: Wipf and Stock, 2000.

Hiebert, Paul G., dan Eloise Hiebert Meneses. Incarnational Ministry: Planting Churches in Band, Tribal, Peasant, and Urban Societies. Illustrated edition. Grand Rapids, Mich: Baker Academic, 1995.

Keller, Timothy. Cultural Engagement: Center Church, Part Five. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan, 2013.

Kempis, Thomas A’. The Imitation of Christ: Translated by Ronald Knox and Michael Oakley. San Fransisco: Ignatius Press, 1959.

Little, Christopher R. Mission in the Way of Paul: Biblical Mission for the Church in the Twenty-First Century. Lausanne: Peter Lang, 2005.

Luzbetak, Louis J. The Church and Cultures: New Perspectives in Missiological Anthropology. New York: ORBIS, 2015.

Macaskill, Grant. Living in Union with Christ: Paul’s Gospel and Christian Moral Identity. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Academic, 2019.

Metzger, Paul. “Enfleshed: The False Dilemma of Union with Christ versus Incarnational Ministry.” Journal Missiology 9, no. 2 (2014).

Olorunnisola, Titus S. “The Church in Conversation for Social Transformation: From Christology to Christo- Praxis.” International Journal of Philosophy and Theology (IJPT) 3, no. 2 (2015). https://doi.org/10.15640/ijpt.v3n2a7.

Philip, Oliver R., dan David M. Best. Mission Strategy US/Canada International Church of the Nazarene. Kansas City: The Paseo, 1971.

Pratt, Zane, M. David Sills, dan Jeff K. Walters. Introduction to Global Missions. Nashville, Tennessee: B&H Academic, 2014.

Smith, Thomas Aaron. “Living Among The Urban Poor: The Practices and Approaches of Incarnational Ministry.” Bakke Graduate University, 2012.

Thormodson, Jeff. “Cross-Cultural Missions Is Building the Body of Christ.” Missio Apostolica, Journal of the Lutheran Society for Missiology XX, no. 2 (2012).

Toren-Lekkerkerker, Berdine, dan Benno van den Toren. “From Missionary Incarnate to Incarnational Guest: A Critical Reflection on Incarnation as a Model for Missionary Presence.” Transformation: An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies 32 (13 April 2015): 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265378814562824.

Vähäkangas, Sigurd Bergmann, Mika, ed. Contextual Theology: Skills and Practices of Liberating Faith. London: Routledge, 2020.

Published

2023-10-30

How to Cite

Aspects of The Concept of Incarnational Service: : A Constructive Critical Analysis of Criticism J. Todd Billings. (2023). TRANSFORMATIO: Jurnal Teologi, Pendidikan, Dan Misi Integral , 1(01), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.61719/Transformatio.A2311.001